Table

lanternhall
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 1:37 am

Table

Postby lanternhall » Wed Sep 13, 2017 1:35 am

We are third. Not bad for an injury hit squad.
aldershot-jg
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:17 pm
Location: Aldershot

Re: Table

Postby aldershot-jg » Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:59 am

And to think that if not for a last second equaliser at Maidstone we would be sitting top right now.
slabman
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:37 pm

Re: Table

Postby slabman » Wed Sep 13, 2017 1:41 pm

i might be a bit silly but I think we are the best team in this league if it wasn't for all the injuries we would be well clear at the top by now
Ascot Shot
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri May 29, 2015 12:51 am

Re: Table

Postby Ascot Shot » Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:28 pm

slabman wrote:i might be a bit silly but I think we are the best team in this league if it wasn't for all the injuries we would be well clear at the top by now



Happy with things so far. Being at the top so early in the season with a long way to go gives others the incentive to shoot you down. I do agree with you that once we get all those injuries sorted we will be a very good side and difficult to beat. The only league position that counts will be the one in May 2018.

COYS.
ians
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 2:29 pm

Re: Table

Postby ians » Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:49 pm

Although I do agree we should be a top side once the injuries die down, its worth noting that Sutton are also missing players at the moment.
As are Beastleigh but we don't need to worry about them as long as Richard Hill is there! :lol:
Amber SUFC
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Table

Postby Amber SUFC » Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:31 pm

lanternhall wrote:We are third. Not bad for an injury hit squad.


We are top, not bad for an injury hit squad :wink:

To be fair we do have some decent players in our squad of 20ish.
steveclivebaker
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 9:58 am

Re: Table

Postby steveclivebaker » Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:47 pm

Amber SUFC wrote:
lanternhall wrote:We are third. Not bad for an injury hit squad.


We are top, not bad for an injury hit squad :wink:

To be fair we do have some decent players in our squad of 20ish.

We have had 9 players missing for the last few games.
Disturbed Postie
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 9:42 pm

Re: Table

Postby Disturbed Postie » Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:03 pm

Amber SUFC wrote:
lanternhall wrote:We are third. Not bad for an injury hit squad.


We are top, not bad for an injury hit squad :wink:

To be fair we do have some decent players in our squad of 20ish.

I see your at kingfield on Saturday, draw will do!
slabman
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:37 pm

Re: Table

Postby slabman » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:14 am

we are top now with half our squad injured I rest my case
aldershot-jg
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:17 pm
Location: Aldershot

Re: Table

Postby aldershot-jg » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:57 am

Amber SUFC wrote:
lanternhall wrote:We are third. Not bad for an injury hit squad.


We are top, not bad for an injury hit squad :wink:

To be fair we do have some decent players in our squad of 20ish.


Yes Sutton have injuries but not to the extent of where you can only name 12/13 first team players. Sutton have a bigger squad so even with injuries they haven't had to resort to naming a bench of youth team players, and that's after having to make 3 loan signings as well to supplement our squad.

Return to “ShotsTalk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Birdman, CH, Google [Bot], Jason, MikeB, scunnyshot, Shot through (& throu, Silverfox(atfc), SW Shot and 55 guests