Video streaming moving forward

Cph.shots
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:44 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Re: Video streaming moving forward

Post by Cph.shots » Mon Oct 12, 2020 5:20 pm

15-4-08 wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 3:18 pm
Cph.shots wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:41 am
15-4-08 wrote:
Sun Oct 11, 2020 7:53 pm
Rose tinted glasses alert!! I have no agenda, but I’m perfectly entitled to be critical of whoever or whatever.
No "rose tinted" here, just a simple and polite request for an approximate quote on what MB said re complaints.
Mark Butler was defending the coverage and having a go back at those who dare to speak up on the clubs FB page yesterday.
Ok, I retract my exaggerated post - need to stay off the sauce.

I still maintain that Mark was trying to say stop complaining when people are entitled to complain (whether something is free or not).
So not really an apology then as you choose to read something MB has written so it suits your agenda.
You also have at least one follower who backs you up 100 %, no matter what "others" say.
I dispair. :roll:

SteveyAsp
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:21 pm
Re: Video streaming moving forward

Post by SteveyAsp » Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:31 pm

The Kings Lynn Chairman isn't happy


Image

NorskShot
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2019 10:47 am
Re: Video streaming moving forward

Post by NorskShot » Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:04 pm

So Wrexham, just down the road from me, sold 2700 streams for their first home game.
I wonder how many Shots sold?

Crowthorne
Posts: 545
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2019 1:18 pm
Re: Video streaming moving forward

Post by Crowthorne » Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:46 pm

SteveyAsp wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:31 pm
The Kings Lynn Chairman isn't happy


Image
Maybe his club have overreacted their level like BW and the interest isn't there.

15-4-08
Posts: 211
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 3:56 pm
Re: Video streaming moving forward

Post by 15-4-08 » Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:53 am

Cph.shots wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 5:20 pm
15-4-08 wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 3:18 pm
Cph.shots wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:41 am


No "rose tinted" here, just a simple and polite request for an approximate quote on what MB said re complaints.
Mark Butler was defending the coverage and having a go back at those who dare to speak up on the clubs FB page yesterday.
Ok, I retract my exaggerated post - need to stay off the sauce.

I still maintain that Mark was trying to say stop complaining when people are entitled to complain (whether something is free or not).
So not really an apology then as you choose to read something MB has written so it suits your agenda.
You also have at least one follower who backs you up 100 %, no matter what "others" say.
I dispair. :roll:
Christ on a bike!! I admitted I was wrong and that’s still not good enough, and you reckon it’s ME who has an agenda!!

I’m not aware that I have a follower, but you’d know all about being one of those!!

Oh, and it’s “I dEspair”, Mr Perfect!!

NorskShot
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2019 10:47 am
Re: Video streaming moving forward

Post by NorskShot » Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:37 pm

How did the Dover streaming compare?
Didn't see it so can someone enlighten us.
I see they are offering the full match stream now for just £3.00. Another good idea.
I hope our club get their finger out

bordon shot
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:13 pm
Re: Video streaming moving forward

Post by bordon shot » Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:49 pm

NorskShot wrote:
Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:37 pm
How did the Dover streaming compare?
Didn't see it so can someone enlighten us.
I see they are offering the full match stream now for just £3.00. Another good idea.
I hope our club get their finger out
I thought it was very good, I’m not sure if it was an automated system or man operated, but all the goals were seen.

Zoom not brilliant & there was a small problem with trying to make out who scored, but in my opinion, if they can improve ours to at least Dover’s standard, there would be no complaints from me.


Post Reply